Comparison of Time to Treatment Between Intravenous and Endovascular Thrombolytic Treatments for Acute Ischemic Stroke
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10320447
PDF

How to Cite

Ganesh Asaithambi, Ameer E. Hassan, Saqib A. Chaudhry, Gustavo J. Rodriguez, M. Fareed K. Suri, Robert A. Taylor, Mustapha A. Ezzeddine, & Adnan I. Qureshi. (2023). Comparison of Time to Treatment Between Intravenous and Endovascular Thrombolytic Treatments for Acute Ischemic Stroke. Journal of Vascular and Interventional Neurology, 4(2). Retrieved from https://ojs.jvin.org/index.php/jvin/article/view/318

Abstract

Background: Intravenous (IV) recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) is used to treat acute ischemic stroke (AIS) within 4.5 hours of symptom onset.
Endovascular treatment (ET) may provide higher rates of recanalization, but longer time to treatment may limit comparative clinical benefit and widespread
applicability.
Objective: This retrospective study compares symptom onset to treatment times in patients who received
both IV rt-PA and ET for AIS and its effect on clinical outcome.
Methods: AIS patients presenting to our facility who received both IV rt-PA and ET were reviewed using
them as case and control to match other factors contributing to time to treatment. Good outcome was
defined as modified Rankin Scale score 0 to 2 at discharge.
Results: Fifty patients received both treatments with significantly shorter mean symptom onset to time to
IV rt-PA compared with symptom onset to time to ET (96.8 ± 39.3 minutes versus 255.3 ± 92.2 minutes, p
< 0.001). Patients receiving ET in less time than the mean time had a higher rate of favorable outcome at
discharge (45.5% versus 11.8%, p = 0.017) and a significantly lower rate of mortality at three months (15.2%
versus 52.9%, p = 0.017) than those receiving it after the mean time. The symptom onset to times to ET was
significantly longer in transferred patients compared to primary emergency department patients (299.3
minutes versus 230.5 minutes, p = 0.01)
Conclusion: A considerable difference in symptom onset to treatment times between IV and ET was
observed among patients with AIS, especially those who were transferred from another facility. Reducing
the time to treatment for ET has the potential to improve outcomes among ischemic stroke patients.

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10320447
PDF
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2023 Journal of Vascular and Interventional Neurology

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.