Safety and Efficacy of Intensified Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients Undergoing Neuroendovascular Procedures
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10374348
PDF

How to Cite

Senka Runjaic, Jerah D. Nordeen, Matthew W. Soto-Arenall, Gretchen S. Johns, David Miller, Benjamin Brown, & William D. Freeman. (2023). Safety and Efficacy of Intensified Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients Undergoing Neuroendovascular Procedures. Journal of Vascular and Interventional Neurology, 9(3). Retrieved from https://ojs.jvin.org/index.php/jvin/article/view/185

Abstract

Introduction—The purpose of this study was to evaluate safety and efficacy of intensified antiplatelet
therapy guided by VerifyNow assay P2Y12 reaction unit (PRU) reported values in patients undergoing neuroendovascular procedures.
Methods—An observational, retrospective review was conducted at a single academic tertiary referral
center and comprehensive stroke center from December 1, 2012, to August 31, 2014. The primary objective
was to determine the prevalence of thromboembolic complications stratified by preprocedural PRU values.
Secondary outcomes were assessed by investigating whether the goal PRU value of 190 or less is sufficient
to reduce thromboembolic complications on the day of the procedure, and 30- and 90-day postprocedure.
Results—There was no statistically significant difference in the overall rate of complications in the two
groups (two events in the group with preprocedural PRU values of 190 or more versus seven events in the
group with preprocedural PRU values of less than 190, p = 0.668). Furthermore, the rates of thromboembolic events by 90 days were not significantly different in the two groups (one event in the group with preprocedural PRU ≥ 190 versus four events in patients with preprocedural PRU < 190, p = 1). Similarly, there
was no statistically significant difference in the rate of hemorrhagic events in the two groups by 90-day
postprocedure (one versus three events, p = 0.558).
Conclusion—The observed rate of thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications in patients with preprocedural PRU values of less than 190 was not significantly different from the rate observed in patients
with preprocedural PRU values of greater than 190.
Sources of funding: No external funding used.

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10374348
PDF
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2023 Journal of Vascular and Interventional Neurology

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.